Imran Khan’s application to become the next chancellor of Oxford University has sparked considerable debate, according to a column by British journalist Catherine Bennett in The Guardian.
She added that Khan, a former cricketer and politician, has made several controversial statements in the past. His views on sensitive issues, such as women’s roles in sexual assault cases and his support for the Taliban’s stance on women’s education, have raised concerns.
Bennett highlights that Khan’s opinions on these matters, including his suggestion that women should avoid “temptation,” have drawn criticism. These views could influence how his candidacy is perceived by the Oxford community, which values inclusivity and progressive ideals.
Khan is proposed as a potential successor to Chris Patten, the outgoing chancellor. While some, like Conservative peer Lord Hannan, have praised Khan as a “towering figure” suitable for the role, others worry about his alignment with Oxford’s values, especially in light of his past remarks and admiration for controversial practices of the Chinese Communist Party.
Read More: Lahore transporters reduce fares after reduction in petrol prices
Moreover, shed highlighted that Khan, who is currently serving a lengthy prison sentence that his supporters claim is politically motivated, would need to reflect Oxford’s values, particularly in discussions about free speech. The chancellorship involves significant responsibilities, including administrative duties and presiding over ceremonies, which require public engagement and accessibility.
Despite Khan’s support, some critics, like journalist Peter Oborne, argue that his candidacy could undermine the university’s values, especially concerning its female students. Oborne suggests that Khan’s bid might even be seen as an insult to women at Oxford.
In contrast, Lady Elish Angiolini, a respected lawyer and former procurator fiscal of Scotland, has emerged as a strong candidate. If elected, Angiolini aims to enhance accessibility for underprivileged students at Oxford.
Furthermore, her career, including her role as principal of St Hugh’s College and chair of significant inquiries into societal issues, positions her as a compelling alternative to Khan. As the election nears, many hope Angiolini’s leadership will better align with Oxford’s values of inclusivity and equality.
